SUPERVISION AND MONITORING
If the financial incentives and safety net provided by surety bail is to be replaced with state-based supervision, there are several important considerations to keep in mind. The first is the cost of such systems. The District of Columbia for example spends $60 million annually on running their system. In addition, it is important to realize that someone must pay for the supervision and monitoring services if the defendant is unable to pay.
Second, is effectiveness. Do such programs work better than a financial condition of bail? If you click through our resources tab, what you will discover is that surety bail is the most effective and cost effective form of release. It reduced fugitive rates, and it substantially decreases the amount of time that fugitives are at large. Does that mean everyone should be on a financial condition of bail—of course not.
Third, government programs that supervise defendants, the vast majority of which are run not by law enforcement, lack the power to arrest or threaten to arrest the defendant if the defendant fails to appear. In addition, there is no third-party who has co-signed the bond like in the vast majority of surety bonds. Thus, surety bonds offer back-end accountability that supervision does not. Monitoring someone and supervising them is great, until they violate. The question then becomes, how do we respond to that, and in the case of government supervision the file gets shuffled over to the police to deal with that defendant whereas a surety bail agent will get that person back in court or suffer a financial penalty.
Finally, supervision programs may unnecessarily ensnare defendants in conditions that they cannot meet. A drug addict cannot simply quit cold turkey because they were ordered to do so. If a government program monitors them and they violate their bond condition of sobriety, they may then face additional charges.
taking viagra for ivf gwendolyn brooks the mother essay here enter https://doceremedspa.com/mgpills/viagra-kuala-lumpur-with-prescription/86/ prednisone what is macbeth tragic hero aristotle essay nurse anesthesia essay examples source link european essay nation nexium expired click here cheapest generic viagra and cialis reviews computer networking thesis statement alfred north whitehead the aims of education and other essays buy levitra overnight delivery synthroid 50 micrograms obesity topics for research paper cialis chinois thesis introduction present tense https://awakenedhospitality.com/buy/pomegranate-fruit-viagra/30/ coursework 24x7 potenzpillen cialis kaufen essay in introduction write https://homemods.org/usc/high-school-persuasive-essay-examples/46/ what effects can 100 mg of viagra have how to success essay nssar knight essay contest how much is viagra in goa how many days to take diflucan for ringworm go here enter What happens when a defendant fails to appear for court?
If a defendant fails to appear for court, the bond goes into forfeiture status and a warrant for arrest is issued for the defendant. Each jurisdiction utilizes different timeframes before the court issues a default to demand payment, but typically, the defendant has a certain amount of time to get back to court (i.e. 30/60/180 days) prior to the default. However, in every case, a warrant is issued for the defendant after failing to appear as required.
Own Recognizance Release (OR), Pretrial Services Release – If a defendant is on an OR release or Pretrial Services release, a warrant is simply entered into the states system for the defendant. In these cases, there is rarely any proactive searching by authorities for the defendant. The defendant will only be returned to court, and the warrant served, should they be arrested for committing another crime or during the course of regular police activity, such as during a routine traffic stop. It is not uncommon for jurisdictions to have thousands of outstanding warrants for these types of releases due to the lack of resources by law enforcement to effectively handle the large caseloads.
Full Cash Release – If a defendant is on a full cash bond and fails to appear, the process is very similar to that above, except that the money that they put on deposit is now forfeited and paid to the court. Once again, a warrant is issued, and the defendant typically isn’t apprehended until they are caught committing another crime or during the course of routine police activity.
10% Bond Release – If a defendant is on a 10% bond release and fails to appear, a warrant is issued for their arrest and the full amount of the bond is forfeited. If payment is not received in full soon thereafter, a default judgement is issued against the defendant for the full amount of the bond. Again, these types of forfeitures are rarely on the priority list for authorities to proactively search for the defendant.
Bail Bond Release – If a defendant is released on a financially secured bail bond and fails to appear, the process is much different. Because a licensed bail bond agent (surety) is involved and accountable for the full amount of the bond, there will be a substantial effort put forth by the bail bond agent to find and retrieve the defendant into custody. If the defendant is returned to custody within the allocated time period, the bail bond agent can be released off the bond (minus any court determined fees). If the defendant is not returned to court within the allocated time period, the bail agent pays the full amount to the court. Licensed bail bond agents are state regulated and follow strict guidelines with respect to apprehension methods and operate within the scope of the law in returning defendants to court. Unlike other forms of release, agents incur 100% of the expense and effort to return defendants to court – even returning defendants who have fled the state to avoid prosecution.